I really appreciate that the Nobel folks do the science communication thing of releasing different explanations of the winners' work for people with different pre-existing levels of understanding nobelprize.org/all-nobel-prize… both "They solved chemistry’s asymmetric mystery" and "Non-linear effects and auto catalysis in asymmetric organic catalysis"
Science · Takes
8 posts in Science that are opinions and questions, where the model is sure of the intent. Page 1 of 2: the top 2, then 1 the model is less sure belong here.
Ranked Bluesky · Mastodon
About 6 in 10 posts here get an intent label; the model only labels the ones it is sure of.
Today’s role model of science is Richard Owen: Scooby Doo villain archetype, coiner of the word “dinosaur.” Described as "social experimenter with a penchant for sadism. Addicted to controversy and driven by arrogance and jealousy” "a damned liar. He lied for God and for malice” “An odious man.”
More in Science
The model is less sure these belong here, so they sit outside the ranking.
If every behavioral science journal did this, including Nature and Science, the world would be a better place.
