Wildroot

Queries may use an external AI service. Details

Wildroot Browser

TodayBusinessSimilar posts

Similar posts

@phpboyscout@hachyderm.io

Pretty much every company I've worked for in the last decade has told me, usually in my first week and often on a slide, that it has a blameless culture. I can't think of an incident I've been near that had no blame in it anywhere. Sometimes it's me, sometimes my team, sometimes a provider having a very bad day. And when nobody can find a culprit, the report calls it an act of god (which, coming from a confirmed atheist, I find hilarious). The original idea, from John Allspaw's 2012 post, was that it's safe to tell the truth about what you did. That's a long way from nobody having done anything, and somewhere between his post and the induction slide one turned into the other.

Show more of this post

I've written fine-grained root cause write-ups and watched them get softened at every layer on the way to the C-suite, until what reached the top was little more than a shrug. The blame stayed where it was shallowest, with the engineers. I'd keep the safety, drop the word, and write the causes down where they are rather than where they're comfortable. #Postmortems #SRE #DevOps #EngineeringCulture phpboyscout.uk/blameless-doesn…

A flat illustration of a cutaway office tower: an engineer at the bottom holds a detailed report, pairs of people on the floors above erase and rewrite it with a giant correction-fluid bottle and eraser, and an executive in the penthouse shrugs with a blank sheet in hand.
Opinion

3 posts close in meaning, closest first

  1. @scottjenson@social.coop

    Classic advice for toxic behavior is "just block". Yes it does help. I've had to block about 10 accounts in the last month and honestly, things have drastically calmed down. It seems to prove that most of the toxic behavior is from a small minority. But In doing user research, it was clear that many people self censor out of fear of toxic blowback. The problem is that it's not just one block, you need to do it many times and each time you do it, your perception of the problem is reinforced. The trick is to get to the other side. Many don't make it. That is my worry.

    Similar topic and wordingTech
  2. The "tiger test" vs AI. So there is this argument that is being made that companies should be liable because the owner of a tiger is liable for the actions of their tiger even if they attempt to train the tiger and fail. This is an utter fallacy and completely misses the point that a manufacturer isn't automatically liable because a user missuses a tool. A gun manufacturer isn't liable for the murder of an individual with that tool. A manufacturer may be liable for negligence in the product in terms of safety, but that's a very different scenario. It's how the AI is used is the potential danger, not a failure in the design of the product.

    Show more of this post

    That is to say the developer of a AI tool that is purely informational shouldn't be liable for either the misuse of that tool, but they may be liable if that AI tool is used as intended/designed and fails causing injury or similar where said application is inappropriate. Where the line is is effectively inserting AI into everything without consideration for the implementation. If you design a product that incorporates AI to assist with software development a failure in the tool is expected. If you design a product like a vehicle and connect it to AI where the product can't fail, well, then you've been negligent, and as a manufacturer you could be liable. If a software developer uses your AI tool to develop an app and is developing something that could kill and can't that's the developer using the AI tool's fault, not the developer of the AI system the developer used. It's not the breeder of the tiger (aka manufacturer) that is liable in the event the tiger owner is negligent in ensuring the tiger is appropriately handled. Use a car to kill someone it's you who is responsible not the manufacturer.

    Similar topic and wordingOpinionAI
  3. I don't know what the answer is for resourcing globally critical projects, but its clear that a lot of key infrastructure for the entire global economy is running on the backs and continued goodwill and willingness of unpaid volunteers who can literally quit anytime. I do know you don't want the world to hinge on whether some guy is currently in the hospital or going through a messy divorce or trying to plan a funeral or just on a ferry for the next 8 hours. #php

    Similar topic and wordingOpinionBusiness