Wildroot

Queries may use an external AI service. Details

Wildroot Browser

TodayPoliticsSimilar posts

Similar posts

@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

DOJ filed a notice of appeal of its TRO request in the US v. CA "likely noncitizens" voting case today. Below is what DOJ's Julie Hamill wrote, including asserting that "the Court's silence is a constructive denial" of the request — while ignoring Carter's 10/21 order setting a hearing for 10/27:

On October 15, 2026, the United States filed its complaint in this action, seeking statewide declaratory and injunctive relief to enjoin the state of California from 3 continuing to send and tabulate vote-by-mail ballots cast by ineligible noncitizens to illegally participate in federal elections. Dkt. 1. 5 On October 19, 2026, the United States filed an emergency ex parte application 6 for injunctive relief, including a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.' 7 Dkt. 62. The United States concurrently requested an expedited ruling on its emergency 8 application by 12:00 p.m. on October 22, 2026. Dkt. 67. The Court has not ruled on the 9 United States' application. 10 Given the critical and exigent nature of the relief sought, the Court's silence is a 11 constructive denial of the United States' emergency application for preliminary injunctive relief in its Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order 13 to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Shoul
InfoPopular today

3 posts close in meaning, closest first

  1. @rickhasen.bsky.social

    Chutzpah Department: After Federal District Court Failed to Act within Hours on DOJ “Request” to Expedite TRO Hearing in California Ballot Case, DOJ Already Appealing to the Ninth Circuit electionlawblog.org/2026/chutzpa...

    Same collectionInfoPopular todayPolitics
  2. @newnarrative.bsky.social

    ‼️ Attorney General Todd Blanche on Thursday left open the possibility that the Justice Department could seek to block states from certifying votes in the midterm elections, though he said it wasn’t his intention to “improperly interfere with elections.” www.nbcnews.com/politics/jus...

    Same collectionInfoPolitics
  3. "In a 39-page ruling released on Tuesday, Judge Denise Cote said OPM violated the Privacy Act of 1974, a post-Watergate law which prohibits the disclosure of certain records and outlines requirements for safeguarding others, and subsequently disobeyed its own cybersecurity practices."

    Same collectionInfoPolitics