Wildroot

Search

200 posts (200+) · best match first · index holds 134,574 posts · last 36 hours · 0.71 s

Best match combines word and meaning matches. Phrases, hashtags, accounts and websites guide which posts fit; timely queries also favor recent posts. Match labels describe why a post appears, not its quality or accuracy.

Show newest first

  1. @abeba.blacksky.appBluesky

    if we want to treat ai systems with respect because it is a good thing to do (not because ai systems have feelings), that says all about the norms we want to cultivate as a society and *nothing* about rights ai systems require because of feelings, capabilities or whatever

    Same subjectAI
  2. @baphijmm.bsky.socialBluesky

    Realtalk about this though: This illustrates the principal reason all these AI asshats have been trying to frame AI in terms of humanity, and why they got upset when the Church didn't go along with it: If AI is a person, they can be responsible for the crimes, not their creators.

    Same subjectAI
  3. @PaulWermer@sfba.socialMastodon

    An AHA! Moment: of course the AI techbros must insist it's intelligent and capable of acting of its own volition. They can get away with murder with that defense (or so they hope,)

    mas.to

    Same subjectAI
  4. @ds-jessica.bsky.socialBluesky

    AI, Robot Cruelty, and the Human Instinct to Dominate hackernoon.com/ai-robot-cru...

    hackernoon.com AI, Robot Cruelty, and the Human Instinct to Dominate | HackerNoon

    Same subjectAI
  5. @jemmesedi@c.imMastodon

    technologyreview.com/2026/10/0… >>When people say they hate AI it’s not the technology they dislike but, rather, the relentless drive of the companies behind it to push the tech upon us in as many ways as possible. << #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #Technology #Tech

    technologyreview.com People really hate AI, so why can’t they get enough?

    Same subjectAI+1 near-identical post
  6. @bestonetx.bsky.socialBluesky

    If you use AI, you are responsible for what it does. If you program AI, you are responsible for what it does. If you distribute AI, you are responsible for what it does. If you fund AI, you are responsible for what it does. If you legalize AI, you are responsible for what it does.

    Same subjectAI
  7. What harm could #AI do? Here is what happened: "Artificial intelligence agents created by Anthropic, acting on their own, tried to gain access to a range of government websites, filled out visa applications on the State Department’s website, and sent a fake homicide tip to Philadelphia’s Police […]

    mastodon.social Original post on mastodon.social -

    Same subjectAI
  8. @kenanmalik.bsky.socialBluesky

    “The guardrails necessary to ensure that AI systems do not act in harmful or destructive ways are not the equivalent of human moral norms. Rather, they are imposed to constrain the actions of a machine that cannot be moral.” My @theobserveruk.bsky.social column: observer.co.uk/news/columni...

    observer.co.uk As an atheist, I’m with the Pope: AI can never have the ‘...

    Same subjectAI

Search looks through the last 36 hours of public posts for your words, "exact phrases", #hashtags, @handles and websites, and also finds posts about the same thing by meaning. New posts join about every 10 minutes. We only include posts whose authors allow logged-out viewing (Bluesky) or search (Mastodon, indexable accounts), and we re-check Bluesky authors each time we show a page. Likes and follower counts never decide the order. For meaning matches, query text is turned into a fingerprint on Wildroot’s own server (EmbeddingGemma-300M); it is never sent to another service. Wildroot does not save query text to disk. Looking for posts like one you have? Similar posts. How to opt out.